Skip to main content
Process Improvement
Brandon Smith3 min read
Overhead view of food production workers on a meat processing line with digital scheduling and OEE overlays

A facility receives customer orders 4-6 weeks in advance. The production manager faces a dilemma: Should they produce continuously to maximize equipment utilization? Or should they produce in waves matching actual demand, accepting lower utilization?

Continuous production = High equipment utilization (85-90%), but inventory builds ($500K tied up in inventory). Demand-matched production = Lower utilization (65-75%), but minimal inventory ($200K).

The choice impacts both operational metrics and cash flow.

The Utilization vs. Working Capital Trade-Off

High Utilization Approach:

  • Production runs continuously (minimize changeovers)
  • Equipment utilization: 85-90%
  • Average inventory: $500K
  • Production lead time: 2-3 weeks
  • Safety stock needed: Higher (demand uncertainty)

Cost: $500K working capital tied up in inventory

Demand-Matched Approach:

  • Production follows 4-week demand forecast
  • Equipment utilization: 65-75%
  • Average inventory: $200K
  • Production lead time: 1-2 weeks
  • Safety stock needed: Lower (short forecast window)

Cost: $300K working capital freed (can be redeployed)

The Decision Framework

The choice depends on:

1. Customer Demand Pattern

  • Smooth demand (consistent orders): Favor continuous production
  • Lumpy demand (sporadic large orders): Favor demand-matched

2. Equipment Changeover Cost

  • High changeover cost (30+ minutes, expensive setup): Favor continuous production
  • Low changeover cost (5-10 minutes): Favor demand-matched

3. Working Capital Constraints

  • Abundant cash: Favor continuous production for utilization
  • Cash-constrained: Favor demand-matched to minimize inventory

4. Sales Expectations

  • Growth phase: Favor demand-matched (avoid excess inventory if demand doesn't materialize)
  • Mature, stable: Favor continuous production (predictable demand justifies inventory)

The Hybrid Approach: Demand-Driven Production with Minimum Batch Sizing

Most food manufacturers benefit from a hybrid:

Month 1-2 Forecast: Use 4-week firm forecast for production planning

Production Batches: Produce in economic lot sizes (typically 1-2 weeks of demand) rather than daily changeovers

Safety Stock: Maintain 1-week safety stock for top 5 SKUs (80/20 rule)

Changeover Discipline: Schedule line changes weekly on fixed days to minimize losses

Example:

  • Total forecasted demand: 100K units/month
  • Economic lot: 25K units (1-week production)
  • Safety stock: 15K units (top SKUs)
  • Average inventory: 40K units (vs. 50K continuous, 20K demand-matched)
  • Utilization: 78%
  • Changeovers: Once weekly (4 total/month vs. 20 daily)

The Working Capital Impact

Hybrid approach typically delivers:

  • Equipment utilization: 75-80% (acceptable productivity)
  • Inventory carrying: 30-35 days (vs. 45+ days continuous, under 15 days demand-matched)
  • Changeover losses: 3-5% of capacity (vs. 1-2% continuous, 8-12% daily)

For a $50M revenue facility with 30-day average inventory and $3M/month production cost:

  • Inventory: $3M (vs. $3.75M continuous, $1.5M demand-matched)
  • Additional working capital: $750K (continuous vs. hybrid)

The PE Perspective

PE investors evaluate working capital efficiency alongside operational metrics. A facility with 75% utilization and $3M inventory is more attractive than one with 85% utilization and $3.75M inventory.

For food manufacturing companies, production scheduling balancing utilization, changeover efficiency, and working capital requirements should target 75-80% utilization with demand-driven batching to optimize both operational and financial performance.